There is still a gap
for a modern set of the complete symphonies that excels in all of the
symphonies in first rate recordings, something which the Russian conductor,
Vasily Petrenko http://imgartists.com/artist/vasily_petrenko http://vasilypetrenko.blogspot.co.uk
aims to fill. So far Petrenko’s
performances, recorded by Naxos www.naxos.com
, have been impressive with excellent
recorded sound. Naxos has just released the eighth disc in their eleven CD
cycle of the symphonies with the Symphony No.7 “Leningrad”, Opus 60 (1941).
8.573057 |
Petrenko hasn’t had the advantage that conductors such as Mravinsky, Kondrashin or Barshai have had of having working with the composer but this hasn’t always been an assurance of a great performance. Naxos’ seemingly inspired choice of Ladislav Slovák, who had met Shostakovich at rehearsals during a stay at Leningrad, where he studied under the great Russian conductor Yevgeny Mravinsky, for their first complete cycle of the symphonies, mainly disappointed.
Shostakovich’s Seventh has often come in for adverse criticism,
mainly due to the repeated march theme of the first movement, a theme
caricatured by Bartok in his Concerto for Orchestra. Yet Shostakovich was
intensely moved by the circumstances of the work’s creation. When Nazi Germany
attacked Russia in June 1941, the composer was in Leningrad (now St.
Petersburg) www.saint-petersburg.com/history/siege.asp
. During the ensuing siege of Leningrad, Shostakovich worked feverishly on the
new symphony saying ‘The music surged out of me, I could not hold it back.’ He
rejected all proposals of a move to Moscow, wishing to remain in his native
city to the end. It was only when ordered to leave, at the end of September
1941, that he reluctantly did so, having already written three of the four
movements of the symphony.
Shortly after arriving in Moscow, Shostakovich spoke to his
biographer, David Rabinovich, about some of the emotions that he had
experienced in beleaguered Leningrad. From this conversation it became clear
what it was that inspired him to write much of this colossal work in so short a
time. Speaking of his own determination to stay, he spoke of a friend who was
to have left by the last train. He had said goodbye to his friends and took a
last look at his beloved city before boarding the train. However, at the first
small station in the suburbs he got out and walked back into the city despite
the hunger, cold and potential death that awaited him.
Much has been written about the meaning behind
Shostakovich’s symphonies. The composer related to Solomon Volkov, in the early
1970s, that ‘the majority of my symphonies are tombstones. Too many of our
people died and were buried in places unknown to anyone, not even their
relatives. It happened to many of my friends…’
Of the Seventh, Shostakovich related to Volkov ‘…war was all
around. I had to be with the people, I wanted to create the image of our
country at war, capture it in music…I have heard a lot of nonsense about the
Seventh and Eighth Symphonies…’ He went on to say that the Seventh was about
the ‘Leningrad that Stalin destroyed and Hitler merely finished off.’
Vasily Petrenko delivers a beautifully paced opening to the Allegretto, quite direct in approach,
just as some of the great Russian interpreters of the past have been. But it is
to the ensuing quiet, slow section that Petrenko brings much poetry, restrained
and wistful. The Royal Liverpool Philharmonic Orchestra are on top form with
some lovely sounds from the principal flute before the entry of the hushed pizzicato
strings and side drum that announce the impending advance of evil forces.
Many who consider this part of the first movement banal
will, perhaps, think again on hearing Petrenko’s superbly judged, finely
balanced working out of Shostakovich’s theme. At times he delivers little
conversations between the instruments to great effect. Whilst there is an
unstoppable inevitability as the music builds, many details are nevertheless
highlighted. It must be remembered that the theme lasts only just over twelve minutes
out of the twenty eight that this performance of the first movement takes
before it collapses in on itself in a terrific climax. Petrenko judges this
climax and the ensuing intense calm perfectly.
The pensive moderato
(poco allegretto) receives a nicely pointed opening before the plaintive
oboe enters, Petrenko extracting so much subtle feeling from the orchestra. The
central faster section has some lively, taut playing with Petrenko still
keeping a rein on the tempo so that, when the music subsides, the slower tempo
dovetails in beautifully. What sensitivity there is when the bassoon quietly
enters against a hushed flute and harp.
In the Adagio, the
opening woodwind and harp sound almost anguished in this performance. There is
a spontaneous feeling from Petrenko at times, as he moves forward the string
melody that follows. As the music falls, he obtains some exquisitely hushed
sounds. The flutes are superb in the next section leading to an extended string
section, surely one of Shostakovich’s loveliest melodies. The climax is
terrific as it builds and, when it subsides, the elegiac viola melody is
beautifully done.
Petrenko handles the quiet and pensive opening of the Allegro non troppo so well, full of
subtleties. As the music slowly gains momentum there is lovely crisp playing
from RLPO, particularly the strings. The whole ensemble of the RLPO is so tight.
Again, when the music slows, Petrenko draws some superb playing, gentle,
anguished and superbly hushed. As the music builds to a terrific final climax,
there is such a feeling of completion and inevitability to this fine performance.
This is an impressive performance. The recording is
excellent with full and open sound from Liverpool’s Philharmonic Hall. With
only the fourth, thirteenth and fourteenth symphonies still to be recorded,
this cycle looks on track to be one of the finest yet recorded.
I love it when folks come together and share post.
ReplyDelete